Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 April 20233156397

Blean Common, Blean, Kent, CT2 9JH

the erection of up to 85 residential dwellings (including 30% affordable housing), structural planting and landscaping, informal public open space, surface water attenuation, vehicular access point from Blean Common and associated ancillary works

Authority
Canterbury City Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Jones G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would accord or conflict with the existing and emerging development plan policies for the area
  • The planning balance, including having regard to matters relating to housing delivery

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites engaged the tilted balance, which the Council accepted meant the adverse impacts of the scheme would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh its benefits.

The combined adverse impacts of the development, including conflict with the development plan, would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole, so the tilted balance favoured granting permission.

Framework references: 11, 74

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy HD4, Policy SS3, Policy R2, Policy R28, Policy DBE1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.