Planning appeal decision
Black Gate Farm, High Mill Road, Cobholm, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR31 0DL
Planning appeal 3245609 at Black Gate Farm, High Mill Road, Cobholm, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR31 0DL (Broads) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 12 August 2021 by Inspector Saward K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether there would be a risk to safety from flooding and the effect of the surfacing on flood risk.
without planning permission, operational development consisting of the surfacing of the Land in impermeable asphalt and the material change of use of the Land from a residential curtilage to a mixed use of a residential curtilage and the standing and use of seven static caravans for the purposes of a residential use in the approximate area marked with hatching on the plan attached to the notice
- Authority
- Broads
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Saward K
- Postcode
- NR31 0DL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether there would be a risk to safety from flooding and the effect of the surfacing on flood risk
- Whether there is compliance with local and national policies for the provision of gypsy and traveller accommodation
- The effect of the surfacing on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether there are any other considerations which outweigh any development plan conflict
What decided it
The unresolved and unassessed flood risk to the highly vulnerable caravan residential use, in the absence of an up-to-date Flood Risk Assessment or evidence satisfying the Sequential Test, outweighed the other considerations in favour of the development.
the harm identified from potential flood risk was so important that the conflict with the development plan was not outweighed by the personal circumstances of the gypsy/traveller families, the best interests of the children, or the social benefits of a settled base, so the appeal on ground (a) failed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM35Policy DM5Policy DM6Policy DM36Policy DM43Policy SP15
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 159Paragraph 162Paragraph 167Paragraph 126Paragraph 59
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Broads
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed24 April 20266002003The Pleasure Boat Inn, Staithe Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR12 0YW
- Dismissed9 December 20253350415Driftwood, 104 Lower Street, Horning, Norfolk, NR12 8PF
- Notice varied and upheld22 April 20253322948The Berney Arms, Berney Arms, Reedham, Norfolk, NR30 1SB
- Notice varied and upheld22 April 20253322890The Berney Arms, Reedham, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR30 1SB
- Notice varied and upheld29 July 20243316184Beauchamp Arms, Ferry Road, Carlton St Peter, Norfolk, NR14 6DH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®