Planning appeal decision
Land at Mount Pleasant Golf Course, Station Road, Lower Stondon, Henlow, SG16 6JL
Planning appeal 3256899 at Land at Mount Pleasant Golf Course, Station Road, Lower Stondon, Henlow, SG16 6JL (Central Bedfordshire) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 17 June 2021 by Inspector Lewis D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issues centre on the effect of the development on: the appearance and landscape character of the golf course and the local distinctiveness of the surrounding area, and the residential amenity of nearby residents in respect of the effect on privacy.
Without planning permission, the carrying out of engineering operations to increase land levels and the re-contouring of the land including the importation of inert waste and soils in non-compliance with the terms of the planning permissions CB/15/01454/MW, CB/17/04034/MW and CB/18/04203/MW for ‘a 9 hole extension to existing golf course incorporating landscaping works and water harvesting system’ on land shown edged red on the attached plan, (‘the land’)
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Lewis D
- Postcode
- SG16 6JL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issues centre on the effect of the development on: the appearance and landscape character of the golf course and the local distinctiveness of the surrounding area, and the residential amenity of nearby residents in respect of the effect on privacy.
What decided it
The as-built landscape and grading of the phase 3 area departed substantially from the approved scheme, causing harm to landscape character that was not outweighed by other acceptable effects, leading to dismissal of the s.73 appeal, while the enforcement notice was quashed because it could not be varied to address only the phase 3 breach without injustice.
the harmful impacts on landscape character weighed heavily against the proposal and were not outweighed by the acceptable effect on residents' privacy, the neutral effect on the heritage asset, and the satisfactory operation of the drainage system, so the balance tipped against the development
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM3Policy DM14Policy GE 9Policy GE 1Policy GE 14Policy GE 20Policy EE14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 197
- Judgments
- Miller Mead v MHLG [1963] 2WLR; Britannia Assets v SSCLG & Medway Council [2011] EWHC 1908 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Notice varied and upheld4 August 2026336326410 Knolls View, Totternhoe, Dunstable, LU6 2BT
- Notice upheld21 July 20263367816109 Clophill Road, Maulden, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 2AD
- Allowed26 June 2026600934922 Moor End, Eaton Bray, Dunstable, LU6 2HN
- Dismissed1 June 20263357460Greenacres, 16 Thorncote Road, Northill, Biggleswade, SG18 9AQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®