Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 October 20213258828

1 Franks Cottages, St. Marys Lane, Upminster, RM14 3NU

Planning appeal 3258828 at 1 Franks Cottages, St. Marys Lane, Upminster, RM14 3NU (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 6 October 2021 by Inspector Clarke B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal represents an inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

a rear two storey extension to existing 'granny annexe

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Clarke B
Postcode
RM14 3NU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal represents an inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the development upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, to which substantial weight must be given, was not clearly outweighed by the limited weight afforded to the other considerations advanced.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited weight of other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DC45
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 138Paragraph 144Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

98 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice upheld25 June 20263358682
    Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
  2. Split Decision23 June 20263377437
    Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD
  3. Split Decision23 June 20263377383
    Noak Hill, Romford, RM4 1LD
  4. Allowed10 April 20266001332
    Bush Farm Back Lakes, Aveley Road, Upminster, RM14 2TQ
  5. Allowed26 February 20266001099
    Havering Park Stables, Bower Farm Road, Havering-Atte-Bower, Romford, Greater London, RM4 1QR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.