Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 November 20213265840

5 Hampton Mead, LOUGHTON, IG10 1TX

new two bedroom dwelling to 5A Hampton Mead

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Warder S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to outlook
  • whether the proposal would be likely to have a significant adverse effect, alone or in combination, on the Epping Forest Special Area for Conservation or, if necessary, provide satisfactory mitigation

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with development plan policies protecting an internationally significant habitat site and safeguarding character, appearance and neighbouring living conditions, and does not benefit from the tilted balance because habitat protection policies apply.

the modest contribution to housing supply was outweighed by conflicts with development plan policies protecting the Epping Forest SAC and safeguarding character, appearance and neighbouring living conditions, with the tilted balance not applying due to habitat protection policies

Framework references: 11, 130, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy CP2, Policy DBE2, Policy DBE4, Policy DBE9, Policy CP1, Policy CP6, Policy DM9, Policy DM10, Policy DM2, Policy DM22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.