Planning appeal decision
37 Western Avenue, Thorpe Village, Egham, Surrey, TW20 8QB
Planning appeal 3266381 at 37 Western Avenue, Thorpe Village, Egham, Surrey, TW20 8QB (Runnymede Borough Council) was allowed on 2 November 2021 by Inspector Jones R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether there are any material changes in circumstances and/or other considerations that lead to a differing view on the effect and acceptability of the alleged development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 39, with particular regard to outlook and privacy.
Construction of a side and rear extension and a loft conversion to a dwelling house
- Authority
- Runnymede Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Jones R
- Postcode
- TW20 8QB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether there are any material changes in circumstances and/or other considerations that lead to a differing view on the effect and acceptability of the alleged development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 39, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
- if not, whether unacceptable harm can be avoided by an amended scheme, and whether such a scheme can be appropriately secured
What decided it
The creation of a hip to the roof facing No 39, reducing the ridge height by approximately 840mm and the roof overhang to 100mm, would provide a meaningful reduction in the mass and bulk of the extension and overcome the unacceptable harm to outlook from the neighbouring property.
The harm to the living conditions of the occupiers of No 39 arising from the proximity and overbearing presence of the extension as built was outweighed by the ability to modify the scheme to remove that unacceptable harm, thereby making the development acceptable in planning terms without requiring demolition and rebuilding.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EE1 of the Runnymede 2030 Local Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130
- Judgments
- Ahmed v SSCLG & Hackney LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 566; R (oao Banghard) v Bedford BC [2017] EWHC 2391 (Admin); Bhandal v SSHCLG & Bromsgrove DC [2020] EWHC 2724 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- decided12 October 20266007528Land Known to the West of 203-221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
- Dismissed12 October 20266006766Land to the West of, 203 - 221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
- Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263377703Land Adjacent to Warren Farm, Green Road, Thorpe, Surrey, TW20 8QT
- Quashed On Legal Grounds10 April 20263375607Redlands Farm Lyne Lane, Virginia Water, GU25 4ES
- Notice upheld11 February 20263344981Loch Fyne, 28 Laleham Reach, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 8RR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®