Planning appeal decision
Whitehall Lodge, Pages Lane, Hornsey, London, N10 1NY
Planning appeal 3266863 at Whitehall Lodge, Pages Lane, Hornsey, London, N10 1NY (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 21 October 2021 by Inspector Cryan M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed extensions on the character and appearance of Whitehall Lodge, a non-designated heritage asset, and on the Muswell Hill Conservation Area.
the erection of a single storey roof extension (with lift overrun above) to provide 6no. 1-bed self-contained residential units including installation of new lift serving the whole building
- Authority
- London Borough of Haringey
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cryan M
- Postcode
- N10 1NY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed extensions on the character and appearance of Whitehall Lodge, a non-designated heritage asset, and on the Muswell Hill Conservation Area
- In respect of Appeal A only, the effect of the proposed additional car parking on living conditions for occupiers of Whitehall Lodge, with particular regard to noise disturbance
What decided it
The significant harmful effect on the character and appearance of Whitehall Lodge as a non-designated heritage asset and on the Muswell Hill Conservation Area, which provides a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework and outweighs the modest housing benefits.
The modest housing benefits and economic support during construction were outweighed by the significant harm to the Conservation Area and Whitehall Lodge as a non-designated heritage asset, to which great weight must be attributed; the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework did not apply because the harm to the Conservation Area provided a clear reason for refusal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP11Policy SP12Policy DM1Policy DM9Policy D4Policy HC1Policy SP14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 189Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Haringey
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed14 October 202660082516 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
- Allowed13 October 20266010745Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
- Dismissed9 October 202660113325 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
- Dismissed8 July 202660049449, Brampton Park Road, Wood Green, N22 6BG
- Dismissed8 July 202660049438, Brampton Park Road, Wood Green, N22 6BG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®