Planning appeal decision
Land Adj. Horseshoe Lodge, Brighton Road, Kingswood, Surrey, KT20 6QZ
Planning appeal 3267544 at Land Adj. Horseshoe Lodge, Brighton Road, Kingswood, Surrey, KT20 6QZ (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 September 2021 by Inspector Harley S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposals would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
erection of a terrace comprising three two-storey 2 bedroom houses with off-street parking. Appeal B4 Ref: APP/L3625/W/21/3269688 Brighton Road, Kingswood, KT20 6QZ
- Authority
- Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Harley S
- Postcode
- KT20 6QZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposals would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect on the setting of the Lodge
- whether satisfactory access to the site has been demonstrated
- whether the effect of the proposals on protected species/habitats has been satisfactorily addressed
- whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the houses proposed at Plots one and two, taking particular account of outlook and light
- the effect on a protected tree
What decided it
The harm by reason of inappropriateness in the Green Belt, combined with harm to openness, the setting of the listed building, access safety, protected species, complete loss of recreational land, poor living conditions for occupiers of Plots one and two, and loss of a protected tree, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The harm by reason of inappropriateness and other harms (urbanisation, heritage setting, access, ecology, loss of recreational land, poor living conditions, loss of protected tree) were not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing supply and economic activity, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify Green Belt development did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS3Policy NHE5Policy DES1Policy DES5Policy NHE9Policy TAP1Policy NHE2Policy NE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed21 September 20266003001Eyhurst Farm House, Outwood Lane, Kingswood, KT20 6JS
- Notice upheld7 August 20263378370Land at Lower Duxhurst Farm, 15 Reigate Road, Sidlow, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 8QH
- Dismissed4 August 20266008838Ashdown, Margery Lane, Lower Kingswood, KT20 7BG
- Dismissed2 June 20266005658108, Horley Road, Redhill, RH1 5AA
- Dismissed20 May 20266003710Southside, Sturts Lane, Walton On The Hill, Surrey, KT20 7RQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®