Planning appeal decision
Eyhurst Farm House, Outwood Lane, Kingswood, KT20 6JS
Planning appeal 6003001 at Eyhurst Farm House, Outwood Lane, Kingswood, KT20 6JS (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was dismissed on 21 September 2026 by Inspector Timothy King, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site can be considered as grey belt and, if so, whether it can be considered as 'not inappropriate' development within the Green Belt.
Demolition of existing detached dwelling and erection of a replacement single storey dwelling
- Authority
- Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Timothy King
- Postcode
- KT20 6JS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site can be considered as grey belt and, if so, whether it can be considered as 'not inappropriate' development within the Green Belt
- Whether the proposal can be considered as a replacement building
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- The effect on the significance of the nearby heritage assets
- If inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal represents inappropriate development within the Green Belt that would materially harm openness, cannot be justified as a replacement building, would harm heritage assets without adequate justification, and fails to demonstrate the very special circumstances necessary to outweigh these harms.
The harm from inappropriate development within the Green Belt, harm to openness, harm to heritage assets, and poor design were not outweighed by any material benefits, and the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development were not demonstrated
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DMP policy NHE5DMP policy NHE9DMP policy DES1
- Judgments
- Methuen-Campbell v Walters [1979] 1 QB 525; Turner v SSCLG [2016] EWCA Civ 466; R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v North Yorkshire County Council [2020] UKSC 3; Athlone House Ltd v SSCLG [2015]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice upheld7 August 20263378370Land at Lower Duxhurst Farm, 15 Reigate Road, Sidlow, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 8QH
- Dismissed4 August 20266008838Ashdown, Margery Lane, Lower Kingswood, KT20 7BG
- Dismissed2 June 20266005658108, Horley Road, Redhill, RH1 5AA
- Dismissed20 May 20266003710Southside, Sturts Lane, Walton On The Hill, Surrey, KT20 7RQ
- Dismissed3 March 20263376689Finns Farm, Small Hills Road, Horley, Surrey, RH6 0HR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®