Planning appeal decision
Ashdown, Margery Lane, Lower Kingswood, KT20 7BG
Planning appeal 6008838 at Ashdown, Margery Lane, Lower Kingswood, KT20 7BG (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 August 2026 by Inspector B Pattison, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
single storey rear extension with shallow pitched roof to extend kitchen/diner. Proposal is adding to existing single storey rear extension
- Authority
- Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- B Pattison
- Postcode
- KT20 7BG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether or not the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal results in disproportionate additions to the original building contrary to paragraph 154 of the Framework and Policy NHE5, and the harm to Green Belt openness is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefit of improved living conditions, and very special circumstances do not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy NHE5Policy CS3Policy DES 1Policy NHE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 142
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed21 September 20266003001Eyhurst Farm House, Outwood Lane, Kingswood, KT20 6JS
- Notice upheld7 August 20263378370Land at Lower Duxhurst Farm, 15 Reigate Road, Sidlow, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 8QH
- Dismissed2 June 20266005658108, Horley Road, Redhill, RH1 5AA
- Dismissed20 May 20266003710Southside, Sturts Lane, Walton On The Hill, Surrey, KT20 7RQ
- Dismissed3 March 20263376689Finns Farm, Small Hills Road, Horley, Surrey, RH6 0HR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®