Planning appeal decision
Lawn Farm, Woolpit, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk , IP30 9RS
Planning appeal 3267909 at Lawn Farm, Woolpit, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk , IP30 9RS (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 13 October 2021 by Inspector Thompson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the setting of the Grade II listed building, known as Lawn Farmhouse.
Full Application for conversion of existing building into a dwelling and Outline Application (some matters reserved, access and layout to be considered) for erection of 5 no new dwellings
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Thompson P
- Postcode
- IP30 9RS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the setting of the Grade II listed building, known as Lawn Farmhouse
- whether the site would be in a suitable location, with particular regard to its accessibility to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposal on the local economy
- whether the requirement to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwellings would prejudice employment generating development by reason of noise
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the setting of the Grade II listed building, when weighed against the public benefits in accordance with paragraphs 199 and 202 of the Framework, was not outweighed by those benefits.
The conventional untilted balance applied because of the heritage harm; the adverse impacts of the proposal, including heritage harm, unsustainable location, loss of employment land, and potential prejudice to adjacent employment uses, were matters of significant weight that comfortably outweighed the claimed benefits of housing delivery and brownfield redevelopment.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy H7Policy HB1Policy E6Policy E4Policy FC1.1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 79Paragraph 105Paragraph 197Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Allowed5 August 20266007731Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
- Dismissed16 June 20266006315Orchard House, Cocks Road, Eye, IP23 7NT
- Notice upheld12 March 20263357418Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP
- Allowed22 October 20253369566Fennings Farm, Pixey Green, Stradbroke, Eye Suffolk, IP21 5NH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®