Planning appeal decision
Aver House, Nursery Road, Nazeing, Essex, EN9 2JE
Planning appeal 3268098 at Aver House, Nursery Road, Nazeing, Essex, EN9 2JE (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 6 October 2021 by Inspector Hunt S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the proposal satisfies the requirements of the GPDO in being permitted development under the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 20, Class ZA, with particular regard to the use of the existing building.
prior approval for the demolition of existing building and construction of one new dwelling in its place
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Hunt S
- Postcode
- EN9 2JE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: whether the proposal satisfies the requirements of the GPDO in being permitted development under the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 20, Class ZA, with particular regard to the use of the existing building
- Appeal B: whether the proposed development would represent inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- Appeal B: the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- Appeal B: whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
For Appeal A, the lawful use of the building was B8 storage and not B1 office use as required by Class ZA, so the development was not permitted development. For Appeal B, the substantial weight given to harm from inappropriateness and moderate weight to harm to openness of the Green Belt was not outweighed by the other considerations advanced.
The substantial harm from inappropriateness and moderate harm to openness of the Green Belt were not outweighed by the moderate weight given to housing land supply contribution, the limited weight given to design acceptability and site tidiness, and the little weight given to removal of commercial use; the fallback position was given limited weight.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- GB2AGB7ADM4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
- Judgments
- Keenan v Woking Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 438; Murrell v SSCLG [2010] EWCA Civ 1367
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®