Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 November 20213268846

Rundells Lodge, London Road, HARLOW, CM17 9LH

the renovation and extension of existing property and erection of a new dwelling to create two, semi-detached four bedroomed homes

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Warder S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the proposal would be likely to have a significant adverse effect, alone or in combination, on the integrity of the Epping Forest Special Area for Conservation or, if necessary, provide satisfactory mitigation
  • other considerations
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations and whether this would amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal's status as inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with its adverse effect on openness and the SAC, could not be overcome by the modest housing contribution and limited other benefits.

the modest benefits of housing supply and restoration of the existing dwelling did not clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, and the adverse effect on the Epping Forest SAC

Framework references: 11, 59, 78, 79, 134, 137, 147, 148, 149, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy GB2A, Policy GB7A, Policy NC1, Policy CP1, Policy CP6, Policy DM22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.