Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 June 20213269395

370 Kingsway, Burnage, Manchester, Lancashire, M19 1PL

Planning appeal 3269395 at 370 Kingsway, Burnage, Manchester, Lancashire, M19 1PL (Manchester City Council) was dismissed on 15 June 2021 by Inspector Baxter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties with regards to noise.

for use of part of the site for the siting of a double-decker catering bus to form hot food take-away for a temporary period of 24 months

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Baxter C
Postcode
M19 1PL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties with regards to noise
  • Whether the proposal is in an appropriate location

What decided it

The significant harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in terms of noise, arising from the proposal's proximity to residential properties and proposed operating hours, outweighed the minimal benefits and could not be mitigated by the proposed measures.

The minimal benefits of employment and a new concept were outweighed by the significant harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with regards to noise.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1 of the Manchester's Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document 2012saved Policy DC10 of the Unitary Development Plan for the City of Manchester 1995saved Policy DC26 of the Unitary Development Plan for the City of Manchester 1995

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

121 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Manchester City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed8 October 20266011214
    Basement To First Floor,, 58 - 60 Portland Street,, Manchester,, M1 4QT
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266008018
    65 Grimshaw Lane, Manchester, M40 2AX
  3. Dismissed9 September 20266011458
    2B Minehead Avenue, Manchester, M20 1FW
  4. Dismissed27 August 20266008362
    16 Dalton Avenue, Manchester, M14 7NR
  5. Dismissed13 August 20266008786
    348 Droylsden Road, Manchester, M40 1GF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.