Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 November 20213270361

794 Rainham Road South, Dagenham, RM10 8YU

Planning appeal 3270361 at 794 Rainham Road South, Dagenham, RM10 8YU (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 2 November 2021 by Inspector Chalk M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of bungalow and erection of 3 x 3 bedroom houses

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Chalk M
Postcode
RM10 8YU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers
  • The availability of on-street parking in the vicinity of the appeal site

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance of the area and to the living conditions of neighbouring residents, combined with loss of on-street parking, outweighed the benefits of delivering two additional dwellings.

The benefits of housing delivery and the site's sustainable location were outweighed by the harm to character and appearance, harm to neighbouring living conditions, and loss of on-street parking.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4 of the London PlanPolicy CP3 of the Core StrategyPolicy BP11 of the Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DocumentPolicy D14 of the London PlanPolicy GG1 of the London PlanPolicy GG3 of the London PlanPolicy BP8 of the Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DocumentPolicy BR9 of the Borough Wide Development Plan Policies Document

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

249 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed8 May 20266002379
    33 Sandown Avenue, Dagenham, RM10 8XD
  2. Dismissed13 April 20266002839
    22 Whitebarn Lane, Dagenham, RM10 9LH
  3. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  4. Dismissed27 March 20263370715
    82 Holgate Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM10 8NB
  5. Notice varied and upheld27 March 20263340354
    197 Broad Street, Dagenham, RM10 9JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.