Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20213271807

Send Barns Stables, Woodhill, Send, GU23 7JR

the erection of 1 x 2 bedroom, 3 x 3 bedroom, 2 x 4 bedroom and 1 x 5 bedroom dwellings and replacement B1 (office) unit, following demolition of the existing buildings

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wyborn D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the effect on openness, the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
  • whether or not the development plan would support the proposed office space, as an alternative to the present business building on the site
  • whether or not the development plan would support the loss of the equestrian facilities in this location
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the design, layout and built form of the scheme
  • the effect of the development on the setting of the nearby listed buildings, namely Tudor Barn Farm Barn (now known as 4-6 Woodhill Court) and the adjacent Barn (now known as Tudor Barn)
  • if the appeal development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The combined substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, loss of employment floorspace, harm to character and appearance, and harm to the setting of listed buildings was not clearly outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme.

The substantial combined harm to the Green Belt, employment land, character and appearance, and heritage assets was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of housing and office delivery, so very special circumstances did not exist and the appeal was dismissed.

Framework references: 149, 138, 202, 147, 148

Plan policies cited: Policy P2, Policy Send 2, Policy E3, Policy Send 9, Policy Send 3, Policy E6, Policy D1, Policy Send 1, saved Policy G5, Policy D3, Policy P5, saved Policy NRM6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.