Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20213271807

Send Barns Stables, Woodhill, Send, GU23 7JR

Planning appeal 3271807 at Send Barns Stables, Woodhill, Send, GU23 7JR (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 3 December 2021 by Inspector Wyborn D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the effect on openness, the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.

the erection of 1 x 2 bedroom, 3 x 3 bedroom, 2 x 4 bedroom and 1 x 5 bedroom dwellings and replacement B1 (office) unit, following demolition of the existing buildings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wyborn D
Postcode
GU23 7JR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the effect on openness, the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
  • whether or not the development plan would support the proposed office space, as an alternative to the present business building on the site
  • whether or not the development plan would support the loss of the equestrian facilities in this location
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the design, layout and built form of the scheme
  • the effect of the development on the setting of the nearby listed buildings, namely Tudor Barn Farm Barn (now known as 4-6 Woodhill Court) and the adjacent Barn (now known as Tudor Barn)
  • if the appeal development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The combined substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, loss of employment floorspace, harm to character and appearance, and harm to the setting of listed buildings was not clearly outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme.

The substantial combined harm to the Green Belt, employment land, character and appearance, and heritage assets was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of housing and office delivery, so very special circumstances did not exist and the appeal was dismissed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2Policy Send 2Policy E3Policy Send 9Policy Send 3Policy E6Policy D1Policy Send 1saved Policy G5Policy D3Policy P5saved Policy NRM6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149Paragraph 138Paragraph 202Paragraph 147Paragraph 148

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

55 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266009962
    Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.