Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 September 20213271920

Kotecha House, 297 Pinner Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 4HF

Planning appeal 3271920 at Kotecha House, 297 Pinner Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 4HF (London Borough of Harrow) was allowed on 22 September 2021 by Inspector Smith A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the external appearance of the building would be acceptable.

Additional two storeys (height 6.95m) of development containing 4 flats on an existing block of flats - maximum overall height 15.9m (Prior approval of transport and highway impacts; air traffic and defence asset impacts; contamination risks; flooding risks; the external appearance of the building; the provision of adequate natural light in all habitable rooms of the new dwellinghouses; impact on amenity of existing and neighbouring premises and impact on protected view)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith A
Postcode
HA1 4HF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the external appearance of the building would be acceptable
  • Whether or not the impact of the proposal upon the amenities of neighbouring occupiers situated to the west of the site would be acceptable, having particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The proposal complies with the prior approval requirements under the GPDO, with external appearance and neighbouring amenity impacts both found acceptable through design measures and the generous separation distance achieved.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1 of the Harrow Council Development Management Policies (July 2013)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

421 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  2. Allowed5 October 20266011608
    6 Mead Close, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 5JN
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266005822
    Former National Grid Site, Marsh Lane, Stanmore, HA7 2SN
  4. Allowed27 August 20266009442
    36 St Kildas Road, Harrow, HA1 1QA
  5. Dismissed31 July 20266007726
    Moon & Sixpence, 250 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End, HA5 4HS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.