Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20213273285

168 Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, EN9 3BE

Planning appeal 3273285 at 168 Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, EN9 3BE (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 25 November 2021 by Inspector Hendley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on biodiversity interests, in particular the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC).

a redevelopment to provide two semi-detached houses

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hendley D
Postcode
EN9 3BE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on biodiversity interests, in particular the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The proposal would have an unacceptable effect on the biodiversity interests of the Epping Forest SAC, with inadequate mitigation to ensure no adverse effect on its integrity.

The protection afforded to the SAC is of a high order and the harm to its integrity outweighs the benefits of housing supply, site optimisation, accessibility standards, energy efficiency and design quality.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
NC1CP1CP6DM 2DM 22H1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 182
Judgments
People Over Wind & Peter Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta C-323/17; Wealden DC v SSCLG, Lewes DC and South Downs NPA [2017] EWHC 351

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

73 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed29 October 20266015320
    55 Weald Hall Lane, Epping, CM16 6NB
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266011962
    Russell Cottage,, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane,, Epping,, CM16 7PE
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266011961
    Russell Cottage, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane, Epping, CM16 7PE
  5. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.