Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20213273285

168 Honey Lane, WALTHAM ABBEY, EN9 3BE

a redevelopment to provide two semi-detached houses

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hendley D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on biodiversity interests, in particular the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The proposal would have an unacceptable effect on the biodiversity interests of the Epping Forest SAC, with inadequate mitigation to ensure no adverse effect on its integrity.

The protection afforded to the SAC is of a high order and the harm to its integrity outweighs the benefits of housing supply, site optimisation, accessibility standards, energy efficiency and design quality.

Framework references: 182

Plan policies cited: NC1, CP1, CP6, DM 2, DM 22, H1

Judgments cited: People Over Wind & Peter Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta C-323/17; Wealden DC v SSCLG, Lewes DC and South Downs NPA [2017] EWHC 351

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.