Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 March 20223273682

62 Arcadian Gardens, Wood Green , London, N22 5AD

Planning appeal 3273682 at 62 Arcadian Gardens, Wood Green , London, N22 5AD (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 10 March 2022 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers.

the change of use of property from a dwelling (C3 use) to a 9 person house in multiple occupation (sui generis use) and the construction of rear dormer extension

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
N22 5AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposal on the supply of family housing in the area

What decided it

The unacceptably adverse effects on the living conditions of both future occupiers and neighbouring occupiers, which substantially and demonstrably outweigh the limited housing supply benefits even under the tilted balance.

The limited benefit to housing supply was significantly outweighed by substantial harm to the living conditions of future occupiers and neighbouring occupiers; the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM17Policy DM12Policy SP2Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy DM17(a)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 11(d)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

544 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  4. Dismissed8 July 20266004944
    9, Brampton Park Road, Wood Green, N22 6BG
  5. Dismissed8 July 20266004943
    8, Brampton Park Road, Wood Green, N22 6BG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.