Planning appeal decision
85A Shepherds Hill, ROMFORD, RM3 0NP
a revised and reduced enclosure to the swimming pool
- Authority
- London Borough of Havering
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cooper W
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policy
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify development
What decided it
The volumetric increase of approximately 27% was found to be well below what would constitute disproportionate additions, and the design ensured the outbuilding would be subservient in scale and height to the host dwelling, thereby satisfying Paragraph 149(c) of the Framework and constituting appropriate development in the Green Belt.
Framework references: 149
Plan policies cited: Policy G2 of The London Plan, Objective xvi) of the LP, LP Policy 26, Policy DC45 of the superseded London Borough of Havering Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®