Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 October 20213274621

Kesteven Way, Kingswood, HULL, HU7 3HJ

described on the application form as ‘Proposed 18m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Coyne C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area, and in the event that any harm is identified, whether that harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation and the lack of less harmful alternative sites

What decided it

The proposal would materially harm the character and appearance of the area through its prominent, bulky and intrusive appearance, and viable less harmful alternative sites exist, such that the need for the installation does not outweigh the harm.

The need for 5G mobile phone coverage and network infrastructure (modest weight) was outweighed by the material harm to character and appearance and the availability of less harmful alternative sites.

Framework references: 114, 115

Plan policies cited: Policy 14, Policy 24

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.