Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 October 20213276650

Summergroves Way, Gipsyville, Hull, HU4 6RZ

Authority
Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Wilson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the setting of the nearby Grade II Listed Buildings
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal upon the living conditions of nearby residents, having regard to outlook

What decided it

The visual intrusiveness of the 15m monopole in the context of single-storey properties, combined with its harmful effect on the setting of Grade II Listed Buildings and the outlook of nearby residents, outweighed the benefits of telecommunications infrastructure provision.

The benefits of 5G network rollout and telecommunications infrastructure were outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, the setting of nearby Grade II Listed Buildings, and the living conditions of surrounding residents.

Framework references: 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy 14, Policy 15, Policy 24

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.