Planning appeal decision
James Reckitt Avenue, Garden Village, Hull, HU8 0EA
proposed 15.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works
- Authority
- Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Megginson C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the prominent siting of the monopole was not outweighed by the benefits of 5G coverage, as less harmful alternative sites had not been properly explored.
Framework references: 115, 117
Plan policies cited: Policy 14, Policy 24
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®