Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 July 20223295514

James Reckitt Avenue, Garden Village, Hull, HU8 0EA

proposed 15.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Megginson C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the prominent siting of the monopole was not outweighed by the benefits of 5G coverage, as less harmful alternative sites had not been properly explored.

Framework references: 115, 117

Plan policies cited: Policy 14, Policy 24

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.