Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Mulletts Barn, Willisham Road, Barking, Suffolk, IP6 8HY
Planning appeal 3276058 at Land Adjacent to Mulletts Barn, Willisham Road, Barking, Suffolk, IP6 8HY (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 22 March 2022 by Inspector Thompson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal with particular reference to development plan policies concerned with housing in rural areas and the accessibility of services and facilities.
Erection of No3 detached dwellings with garages
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Thompson P
- Postcode
- IP6 8HY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal with particular reference to development plan policies concerned with housing in rural areas and the accessibility of services and facilities
- whether acceptable living conditions could be provided for future occupiers of the proposed dwellings, with regard to odour and pests
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the countryside, including the Special Landscape Area within which it is situated and the setting of the listed building, Mulletts Farmhouse
- whether acceptable living conditions could be provided for future occupiers of the proposed dwellings, with regard to noise and disturbance
What decided it
The adverse impacts of poor accessibility to services and facilities and potential harm to living conditions from odour and pests significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under the tilted balance test.
The adverse impacts regarding accessibility to services and facilities and potential disturbance from odour and pests significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited social and economic benefits of three new dwellings and environmental benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy H7Policy CL2Policy CS5Policy FC1Policy FC1.1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 79Paragraph 105Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 199Paragraph 92
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Allowed5 August 20266007731Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
- Dismissed16 June 20266006315Orchard House, Cocks Road, Eye, IP23 7NT
- Notice upheld12 March 20263357418Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP
- Allowed22 October 20253369566Fennings Farm, Pixey Green, Stradbroke, Eye Suffolk, IP21 5NH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®