Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 April 20223277700

708 Lordship Lane, LONDON, N22 5JN

change of use from a dwelling (C3 use) to a 7 bedroom 9 person HMO (Sui Generis) including single-storey rear extension, hip to gable roof extension, rear dormer and installation of three rooflights in front roof slope

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Owen A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with respect to noise and disturbance
  • whether the development would provide satisfactory living conditions for its future occupiers with regard to their outlook, internal living space and cycle and waste storage
  • the effect of the proposal on the character of the area

What decided it

The failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for the occupier of room 2 and the unacceptable harmful impact on neighbouring occupiers' living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweighed the housing supply benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

The adverse impacts on neighbouring living conditions and future occupier amenity significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefit of providing seven units of accommodation (net six units after loss of existing dwelling), such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 130

Plan policies cited: DM17, DM12, D6, DM10, SP2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.