71 Shepherds Hill, Romford, ESSEX, RM3 0NP

a first floor rear extension (extension of existing dormer)

Authority: London Borough of Havering
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Davies E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and the development plan
The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area
The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular reference to outlook and privacy
Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with regard to outlook
If the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness, character and appearance, and neighbouring amenity, with no very special circumstances to justify it.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy DC45, Policy DC61, London Plan Policy D4, Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document, Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document

Read the decision letter on the Inspectorate’s site

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

What an account adds

Draw a red line around your site and the appraisal follows.

Heritage. Listed buildings by grade and distance, conservation areas, scheduled monuments, registered parks and gardens, heritage at risk.
Landscape and environment. Green belt, national parks and national landscapes, SSSIs, ancient woodland, SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites, nutrient catchments.
Flooding. Flood zones 2 and 3, surface water, and both again with climate change.
Transport. The 800 metre station catchment and service frequency, bus stops with their weekday frequency, the cycle network, and the Framework’s transport tests measured for the site.

Then the development plan position, the housing land supply as an Inspector last accepted it, and every appeal decided around the site with its letter.

Every English appeal since 2016, with the letter behind it wherever the Inspectorate published one. Searched by meaning as well as by words, with the key case law counted live across the letters.

Casework that chases the deadlines. Applications, appeals and conditions with their statutory dates.

The judgement stays yours. The tool gathers the material and dates it.