3 The Paddocks, Badwell Ash, Bury St. Edmunds, IP31 3LW

Planning appeal 3278553 at 3 The Paddocks, Badwell Ash, Bury St. Edmunds, IP31 3LW (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 20 December 2021 by Inspector Price J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the weight given to the factor of re-use of previously developed land would be sufficient to outweigh any harm found to the character and appearance of the area.

Outline planning permission for a new dwelling with all matters reserved

Authority: Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Price J
Postcode: IP31 3LW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the weight given to the factor of re-use of previously developed land would be sufficient to outweigh any harm found to the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The status of the site as previously developed land would not amount to sufficient grounds to depart from the earlier appeal decision, as the proposal would give rise to a similar degree of harm to character and appearance that would significantly and demonstrably outweigh its benefits.

The adverse impacts on character and appearance would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the proposal's benefits (housing supply, self-build provision, and local economic benefits), such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development would not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: CS1CS2LP H7CS5GP1H13H15LP H10
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 174

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

Dismissed15 October 20266012038
The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
Dismissed14 July 20266006362
Land at Walsham Road, Wattisfield, Suffolk, IP22 1PB
Dismissed11 February 20263369785
Land at Five Acre Campsite, College Road, Wyverstone, Suffolk, IP14 4SD
Dismissed4 November 20253369090
Finches Meadow, Stradbroke Road, Horham, IP21 5DZ
Dismissed8 August 20253363636
Land At Summertime, Great Green, Thurston, IP31 3SJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.