Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 November 20213279628

6 Rosemarie Close, Leavesden, Watford, WD25 7NP

Planning appeal 3279628 at 6 Rosemarie Close, Leavesden, Watford, WD25 7NP (Three Rivers District Council) was allowed on 26 November 2021 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on on street parking provision and the effective operation of the public highway.

conversion of garage into habitable room and extension of driveway

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Callister V
Postcode
WD25 7NP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on on street parking provision and the effective operation of the public highway
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area with reference to loss of planting

What decided it

The proposed hardstanding extension would maintain the required three off-street parking spaces for a four-bedroom house, and the slight harm to character and appearance from loss of planting would be outweighed by the visual benefit of replacing the garage door with a window.

The slight harm to character and appearance from loss of planting was outweighed by the improved appearance of the property and the maintenance of adequate parking provision in accordance with policy requirements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP1Policy CP10Policy CP12Policy DM1Policy DM13Appendix 2Appendix 5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 55Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

109 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Three Rivers

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed12 October 20266002930
    Land to the Rear of, 76 and 78 Church Lane, Sarratt, WD3 6HL
  2. Dismissed30 June 20266004957
    Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
  3. Dismissed17 June 20266005833
    8 Moneyhill Parade Uxbridge Road, Rickmansworth, WD3 7BE
  4. Dismissed8 June 20266002193
    114 Denham Way, Maple Cross, WD3 9SP
  5. Dismissed18 May 20266001796
    2 Prangnell Hill House, 23 Trowley Rise, Abbots Langley, Watford, Herts, WD5 0LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.