Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 October 20213280218

89 Grove Farm Crescent, Cookridge, LEEDS, LS16 6BZ

Single storey side extension, dormer loft conversion with hip-to-gable extension and alteration to the existing parking

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Scott A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would result in a disjointed and visually intrusive combination of roof formats that would be detrimentally harmful to the character and appearance of the area, conflicting with the development plan.

Although the proposal complied with highway safety and parking policy, the harm to character and appearance arising from the disjointed combination of roof formats outweighed this, and the conflict with the development plan was decisive.

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy 2019, Unitary Development Plan policy BD6, Policy T2 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy 2019

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.