Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 October 20213280218

89 Grove Farm Crescent, Cookridge, Leeds, LS16 6BZ

Planning appeal 3280218 at 89 Grove Farm Crescent, Cookridge, Leeds, LS16 6BZ (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 26 October 2021 by Inspector Scott A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

Single storey side extension, dormer loft conversion with hip-to-gable extension and alteration to the existing parking

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Scott A
Postcode
LS16 6BZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would result in a disjointed and visually intrusive combination of roof formats that would be detrimentally harmful to the character and appearance of the area, conflicting with the development plan.

Although the proposal complied with highway safety and parking policy, the harm to character and appearance arising from the disjointed combination of roof formats outweighed this, and the conflict with the development plan was decisive.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy 2019Unitary Development Plan policy BD6Policy T2 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy 2019

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

99 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266011321
    Land to the Rear of, 14 to 16 Cross Hills Kippax, Kippax, LS25 7JP
  2. Dismissed21 September 20266009737
    12 Hyde Park Terrace, Leeds, LS6 1BJ
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266010416
    Stonewood, Almshouse Hill, Leeds, LS23 6QX
  4. Allowed3 September 20266007907
    9 Vinery Grove, Richmond Hill, Leeds, LS9 9LT
  5. Dismissed14 August 20266006204
    193 Easterly Road, Leeds, LS8 2RB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.