Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 October 20266011321

Land to the Rear of, 14 to 16 Cross Hills Kippax, Kippax, LS25 7JP

Planning appeal 6011321 at Land to the Rear of, 14 to 16 Cross Hills Kippax, Kippax, LS25 7JP (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 1 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on highway safety in relation to access and car parking provision.

a retrospective application: car park layout at Ash Court and storage unit rear of Cross Hills

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
other
Postcode
LS25 7JP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety in relation to access and car parking provision
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The unacceptable adverse impact on highway safety in relation to access and car parking provision substantially outweighed the limited benefit of utilising previously developed land.

The benefits of granting planning permission, being the use of previously developed land with limited positive weight, were substantially outweighed by the unacceptable harmful effect on highway safety, to which the Inspector attached significant weight.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T2 of the Leeds Core StrategyPolicy P10 of the Leeds Core StrategyPolicy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan ReviewSaved Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan ReviewPolicy BE1 of the Kippax Neighbourhood Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

37 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed21 September 20266009737
    12 Hyde Park Terrace, Leeds, LS6 1BJ
  2. Dismissed4 September 20266010416
    Stonewood, Almshouse Hill, Leeds, LS23 6QX
  3. Allowed3 September 20266007907
    9 Vinery Grove, Richmond Hill, Leeds, LS9 9LT
  4. Dismissed14 August 20266006204
    193 Easterly Road, Leeds, LS8 2RB
  5. Dismissed10 July 20266006482
    1A Back Newton Grove, Potternewton, Leeds, LS7 4HL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.