Planning appeal decision
Shottendane Road, Margate, Kent, CT9 4NF
Planning appeal 3280446 at Shottendane Road, Margate, Kent, CT9 4NF (Thanet District Council) was allowed on 23 February 2022 by Inspector Cliff D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal makes acceptable provision for affordable housing, taking account of viability.
outline planning application for up to 450 residential dwellings (including market and affordable housing), structural planting and landscaping, formal and informal public open space and children's play area, sustainable urban drainage, with vehicular access points, including associated ancillary works and operations from Hartsdown Road, Shottendane Road and Manston Road. All matters reserved with the exception of site access
- Authority
- Thanet District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Cliff D
- Postcode
- CT9 4NF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal makes acceptable provision for affordable housing, taking account of viability
- The effect on the integrity of the Thames Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Ramsar site
- The effect upon the setting and significance of designated heritage assets in the vicinity of the site, with particular regard to the effect on nearby listed buildings
What decided it
The very significant benefits of delivering up to 450 dwellings (including 68 affordable homes) in the context of the Council's shortfall in housing land supply were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited landscape/visual harm and the less than substantial heritage harm identified.
The limited adverse landscape/visual effects, loss of agricultural land, and less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the very significant benefits of housing delivery (including affordable housing), highway infrastructure improvements and economic benefits, such that the proposal amounted to sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP21Policy SP22Policy SP23Policy SP26Policy SP29Policy SP30Policy SP41Policy SP42Policy SP47Policy E16Policy CC01Policy CC02Policy HE03Policy QD05
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Thanet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed15 June 2026600433017 Cliftonville Avenue, Ramsgate, CT12 6DS
- Dismissed27 November 20253369010The Lodge, Sacketts Hill, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2QS
- Allowed10 November 20253365966Disused Railway Line, Tivoli Road, Margate, Kent, CT9 4BZ
- Allowed4 November 2025336786314 North Foreland Road, Broadstairs, CT10 3NN
- Allowed27 October 20253370093Parkside, 54 - 56 Dane Road, Margate, Kent, CT9 2AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®