Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 December 20213280954

Saltshouse Road , Sutton, Kingston Upon Hull , HU8 9EY

Planning appeal 3280954 at Saltshouse Road , Sutton, Kingston Upon Hull , HU8 9EY (Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council) was dismissed on 7 December 2021 by Inspector Wilkinson F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the safe use of the highway with particular regard to the junction of Howdale Road with Saltshouse Road.

a proposed 15m phase 8 monopole C/W wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Wilkinson F
Postcode
HU8 9EY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the safe use of the highway with particular regard to the junction of Howdale Road with Saltshouse Road
  • if there is any harm, whether this is outweighed by the need to site the proposed development in the location proposed having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites

What decided it

The unresolved concern about whether the proposed development would further impede visibility at the junction of Howdale Road with Saltshouse Road, which could not be ruled out as harmless to highway safety, outweighed the benefits of 5G infrastructure delivery.

The significant benefits of 5G coverage and mast sharing were outweighed by the unresolved concerns about the effect of the proposed development on highway safety at the junction of Howdale Road with Saltshouse Road.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 24(a) of the Hull Local Plan 2016 to 2032, adopted 2017
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed22 May 20263360486
    16 Melbourne Street, Hull, HU5 2ET
  2. Dismissed22 May 20263360477
    11 Melbourne Street, Hull, HU5 2ET
  3. Notice upheld22 May 20263359233
    113 Spring Bank, Hull, HU3 1BH
  4. Notice upheld22 May 20263359093
    113 Spring Bank, Hull, HU3 1BH
  5. Allowed19 May 20266004395
    3 Norton Grove, Hull, HU4 6HG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.