Planning appeal decision
Tindall House, Toad Lane, Mundham, NR35 2EQ
Planning appeal 3281109 at Tindall House, Toad Lane, Mundham, NR35 2EQ (South Norfolk District Council) was dismissed on 25 February 2022 by Inspector Chamberlain G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development with reference to the spatial strategy in the development plan.
the erection of 5 no. eco-friendly dwellings
- Authority
- South Norfolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Chamberlain G
- Postcode
- NR35 2EQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development with reference to the spatial strategy in the development plan
- The accessibility of services and facilities
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular reference to visibility
What decided it
The adverse impacts of the proposal—comprising conflict with the spatial strategy, poor accessibility to services and facilities requiring car dependency, and significant harm to character and appearance—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and modest economic and social contributions.
The significant harm to character and appearance, conflict with the spatial strategy (moderate weight), and poor accessibility requiring car dependency (significant weight) were weighed against modest benefits from housing delivery (moderate weight), limited economic benefits, limited social benefits, and neutral environmental performance, with the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1.3Policy DM1.4Policy DM3.8Policy DM3.10Policy DM3.11Policy DM4.9Policy 1 of the JCSPolicy 2 of the JCSPolicy 6 of the JCS
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 80Paragraph 105Paragraph 130
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Norfolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed12 October 20266010930Land East of Darnell House, Church Lane, Hethel, NR14 8HF
- Dismissed29 September 20266008791Land West Of The Old Hall, Watton Road, Colney, NR4 7TX
- Allowed25 September 20266004780Land Off Alburgh Road, Hempnall, Norwich, NR15 2NS
- Dismissed24 September 20266010418Land South of Darlifields, Heywood Road, Tibenham, NR16 1PB
- Dismissed5 August 20266005304Land East Of Low Road, Tasburgh, Norwich, NR15 2AR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®