Planning appeal decision
Land at Alnebury, Norwood Hill Road, Norwood Hill, RH6 0EB
Planning appeal 3282272 at Land at Alnebury, Norwood Hill Road, Norwood Hill, RH6 0EB (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was allowed on 14 October 2022 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the openness of the Green Belt, and upon the purposes of the Green Belt in relation to safeguarding the countryside from encroachment.
the use of land for the stationing of caravans for residential purposes, together with the formation of hardstanding and utility/dayroom without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 16/00922/F (
- Authority
- Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- RH6 0EB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development upon the openness of the Green Belt, and upon the purposes of the Green Belt in relation to safeguarding the countryside from encroachment
- the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
- the need for, and provision of, accommodation for gypsies and travellers within the area
- the accommodation needs and other personal circumstances of the proposed occupiers, and consideration of relevant statutory duties and rights
- if inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the scheme in the Green Belt
What decided it
The combination of the pressing unmet need for traveller pitches, the absence of a suitable alternative site, and the personal circumstances and best interests of the children amounted to very special circumstances that clearly outweighed the Green Belt harm.
The very special circumstances comprising unmet need, lack of alternative sites, and the personal circumstances/best interests of the children clearly outweighed the substantial Green Belt harm and other harm, justifying a grant of permanent planning permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS3Policy DES1Policy NHE5Policy GTT1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 148
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed21 September 20266003001Eyhurst Farm House, Outwood Lane, Kingswood, KT20 6JS
- Notice upheld7 August 20263378370Land at Lower Duxhurst Farm, 15 Reigate Road, Sidlow, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 8QH
- Dismissed4 August 20266008838Ashdown, Margery Lane, Lower Kingswood, KT20 7BG
- Dismissed2 June 20266005658108, Horley Road, Redhill, RH1 5AA
- Dismissed20 May 20266003710Southside, Sturts Lane, Walton On The Hill, Surrey, KT20 7RQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®