Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 August 20223282517

Hair Clips, 68 HIGH ROAD, CHADWELL HEATH, , ROMFORD, BARKING AND DAGENHAM, , London, RM6 6PP

conversion of the rear ground floor storage / extension into 1 (1x 1 bedroom), together with amenities

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Harding C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers in terms of private and usable outdoor space and sense of place and arrival
  • Whether the proposed development would provide sufficient space for car parking

What decided it

The proposed development would fail to provide adequate private and useable outdoor space of at least 20 sq.m as required by BDDP Policy BP5, thereby providing unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers, which harm substantially outweighed the modest housing supply benefits.

The substantial harm from inadequate living conditions (specifically insufficient outdoor space) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of providing a single additional dwelling and modest construction employment, such that the proposal did not represent sustainable development.

Framework references: 11, 104, 108

Plan policies cited: BDDP Policy BP5, BDDP Policies BP8, BDDP Policies BP11, LP Policy D6, LP Policy D4, Draft Local Plan Policy DMD1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.