Planning appeal decision
St. Leonards Road, Nazeing, Waltham Abbey, EN9 2HQ
Planning appeal 3284002 at St. Leonards Road, Nazeing, Waltham Abbey, EN9 2HQ (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 22 September 2022 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development proposed would provide appropriate accessibility for disabled residents.
replacement planning application for 5 flats to replace approved consent EPF/1547/18
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Ollerenshaw M
- Postcode
- EN9 2HQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development proposed would provide appropriate accessibility for disabled residents
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to whether it would make adequate provision for car parking
- whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to external amenity space and privacy
- whether the appeal site would be in a suitable location for the development proposed with particular regard to access to services, facilities and sustainable transport options
What decided it
The proposal would not secure disabled housing provision in perpetuity, would not provide adequate car parking to highway standards, and would not provide satisfactory living conditions due to lack of private amenity space and privacy, and these adverse impacts would significantly and demonstrably outweigh any benefits even if a 5-year housing land supply could not be demonstrated.
Even applying the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d)(ii), the adverse impacts of inadequate disabled housing provision, insufficient car parking detrimental to highway safety, and unsatisfactory living conditions would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of additional housing units and modest economic benefits, particularly given that the site already benefits from planning permission for the same quantum of development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP1Policy D4Policy I1APolicy DBE6Policy ST4Policy ST6Policy T1Policy DBE8Policy DM9Policy DM10Policy DBE1Policy DBE9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982) JLP 37
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed12 August 202660045908 Ollards Grove, Loughton, IG10 4DW
- Allowed10 July 2026600261339, Dukes Avenue, Theydon Bois, CM16 7HG
- Allowed2 March 20263376029The Glen, Bournebridge Lane, Romford, RM4 1LT
- Allowed19 February 20263375075Land Adjacent to 33 Maypole Drive, Chigwell, Essex, IG7 6DE
- Dismissed27 January 2026337369415a Station Road, Epping, Essex, CM16 4HG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®