Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 August 20223286584

100 Toms Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8NL

Planning appeal 3286584 at 100 Toms Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8NL (Three Rivers District Council) was dismissed on 12 August 2022 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

described as, “Construction of three terrace dwellings with associated parking and landscaping, following the demolition of the existing house, garage and outbuildings”

Authority
Three Rivers District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
WD4 8NL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The unacceptable and significantly harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area, with substantial weight, outweighed the moderate weight of housing and economic benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

the substantial weight of harm to character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate weight of housing delivery and economic benefits, assessed against the policies of the Framework taken as a whole

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP11Policy CP1Policy CP12Policy DM2Policy DM1Appendix 2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 69Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 149
Judgments
Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham BC [2015] EWCA Civ 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

101 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Three Rivers

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed24 September 20266010198
    Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
  2. Dismissed12 August 20266006827
    Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
  3. Dismissed30 June 20266004957
    Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
  4. Dismissed8 June 20266005787
    Popes Croft, Chandlers Lane, Rickmansworth, WD3 4NE
  5. Dismissed16 April 20266001382
    Old Farm Harthall Lane, Kings Langley, Please Select, WD4 8JW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.