Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 August 20223286584

100 Toms Lane, KINGS LANGLEY, WD4 8NL

described as, “Construction of three terrace dwellings with associated parking and landscaping, following the demolition of the existing house, garage and outbuildings”

Authority
Three Rivers District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The unacceptable and significantly harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area, with substantial weight, outweighed the moderate weight of housing and economic benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

the substantial weight of harm to character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate weight of housing delivery and economic benefits, assessed against the policies of the Framework taken as a whole

Framework references: 8, 11, 69, 126, 130, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy CP11, Policy CP1, Policy CP12, Policy DM2, Policy DM1, Appendix 2

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham BC [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.