Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 October 20223288539

Limpsfield Lawn Tennis Club, Detillens Lane, Limpsfield, Surrey, RH8 0DH

Planning appeal 3288539 at Limpsfield Lawn Tennis Club, Detillens Lane, Limpsfield, Surrey, RH8 0DH (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 19 October 2022 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect that varying the conditions would have on the living conditions of the occupants of the nearby residential properties in relation to light pollution, noise and disturbance.

the erection of 18 x 7m high floodlights on courts 2, 3, 4 and 5 without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref TA/2012/299, dated 23 May 2012

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Redford R
Postcode
RH8 0DH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect that varying the conditions would have on the living conditions of the occupants of the nearby residential properties in relation to light pollution, noise and disturbance

What decided it

The difference in site circumstances between the two groups of courts: courts 2-5 lack intervening screening and remain proximate to sensitive residential properties, whereas courts 6-8 benefit from additional on-site development providing screening and are centrally located within the site.

The private benefit to the club of extended tennis scheduling was outweighed by the protection of residential amenity for courts 2-5, but for courts 6-8 the additional screening and central location meant no significant harm would result from the variation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BE1Policy RT6Policy EV9Policy CSP18Policy DP7Policy DP22

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

93 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed8 July 20266002898
    Land at Longsdon Way, Caterham, CR3 6BN
  2. Allowed16 June 20266005965
    Dippen Hall, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, RH7 6JX
  3. Allowed4 November 20253370123
    Rowlands Farm Newchapel Road, Lingfield, RH7 6BJ
  4. Allowed17 June 20253355743
    Land West of Chapel Road, Smallfield, Surrey, RH6 9JH
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds27 February 20253322983
    Land at Allesley Farm, Farleigh Road, Warlingham, CR6 9PE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.