®Planning appeal decision
Limpsfield Lawn Tennis Club, Detillens Lane, Limpsfield, Surrey, RH8 0DH
the erection of 18 x 7m high floodlights on courts 2, 3, 4 and 5 without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref TA/2012/299, dated 23 May 2012
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Redford R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect that varying the conditions would have on the living conditions of the occupants of the nearby residential properties in relation to light pollution, noise and disturbance
What decided it
The difference in site circumstances between the two groups of courts: courts 2-5 lack intervening screening and remain proximate to sensitive residential properties, whereas courts 6-8 benefit from additional on-site development providing screening and are centrally located within the site.
The private benefit to the club of extended tennis scheduling was outweighed by the protection of residential amenity for courts 2-5, but for courts 6-8 the additional screening and central location meant no significant harm would result from the variation.
Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy RT6, Policy EV9, Policy CSP18, Policy DP7, Policy DP22
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.