Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 February 20233289276

VACANT LAND REAR OF 100 TO 110, MERIDEN AVENUE, WOLLASTON, Stourbridge, DY8 4QR

the erection of a new dwellinghouse

Authority
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Law T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on protected species, namely badgers
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future reference, with particular reference to light, outlook and ventilation
  • the effect of the proposed development on trees

What decided it

The proposal fails on multiple independent grounds, principally the unacceptable harm to character and appearance through backland development contrary to the established pattern, and the failure to demonstrate acceptable effects on protected badgers through insufficient survey evidence.

Framework references: 130, 180, 131

Plan policies cited: Policy ENV2, Policy ENV1, Policy ENV3, Policy HOU1, Policy CSP4, Policy S8, Policy S1, Policy S21, Policy L1, Policy D2, Policy S22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.