Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 February 20223290108

21 Woodhall Croft, Stanningley, PUDSEY, LS28 7TU

Double Storey Rear Extension, Garage Conversion with Extended Front Wall, Increased Height & Roof Alterations & Front Porch

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Nilsson A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupants of the host property with regard to amenity space
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupants of adjacent residential properties with regard to outlook

What decided it

The proposed development would result in an unacceptable reduction in private amenity space for a family-sized dwelling and would cause significant harm to the outlook of adjacent residential properties through its dominant and imposing appearance.

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy (2014 Amended 2019), saved Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (2006), saved Policy BD5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (2006), Policy HDG2 of the Leeds Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.