Planning appeal decision
Meadow Farm Hyde Lane, Nash Mills, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8SA
Planning appeal 3291601 at Meadow Farm Hyde Lane, Nash Mills, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8SA (Three Rivers District Council) was dismissed on 10 May 2023 by Inspector Wright Y, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on its openness.
demolition of buildings 8 & 9 and erection of rural worker’s dwelling for groom’s accommodation
- Authority
- Three Rivers District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wright Y
- Postcode
- HP3 8SA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on its openness
- Whether the development would make satisfactory provision for affordable housing in accordance with development plan policy
- If the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal was inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing harm to openness, and the other considerations advanced did not amount to the very special circumstances needed to outweigh this harm.
the other considerations, including limited housing supply and economic benefits, did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm by reason of inappropriateness in the Green Belt and other harm identified, so very special circumstances did not exist and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP11Policy DM2Policy CP1Policy CP12Policy DM7Policy CP4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 137Paragraph 80Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Three Rivers
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed24 September 20266010198Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
- Dismissed12 August 20266006827Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
- Dismissed30 June 20266004957Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
- Dismissed8 June 20266005787Popes Croft, Chandlers Lane, Rickmansworth, WD3 4NE
- Dismissed16 April 20266001382Old Farm Harthall Lane, Kings Langley, Please Select, WD4 8JW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®