Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed4 January 20233292204

62-64 High Green, Brooke, Norwich, NR15 1JD

Planning appeal 3292204 at 62-64 High Green, Brooke, Norwich, NR15 1JD (South Norfolk District Council) was allowed on 4 January 2023 by Inspector Spencer D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including that of the host Brooke and Kirstead Conservation Area.

a two storey side annexe without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2016/2188, dated 22 November 2016

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Spencer D
Postcode
NR15 1JD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including that of the host Brooke and Kirstead Conservation Area

What decided it

The disputed occupancy condition no longer serves a justified planning purpose as the removal would not result in significant harm to character and appearance or materially increase residential occupation at the site.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 2 of the Joint Core StrategyPolicy DM3.5 of the South Norfolk Local Plan Development Management Policies Document 2015Policy DM3.8 of the South Norfolk Local Plan Development Management Policies Document 2015Policy DM4.10 of the South Norfolk Local Plan Development Management Policies Document 2015Policy DM3.7Policy DM3.13 of the South Norfolk Local Plan Development Management Policies Document 2015
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 189Paragraph 195Paragraph 199Paragraph 130Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Norfolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed12 October 20266010930
    Land East of Darnell House, Church Lane, Hethel, NR14 8HF
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266008791
    Land West Of The Old Hall, Watton Road, Colney, NR4 7TX
  3. Allowed25 September 20266004780
    Land Off Alburgh Road, Hempnall, Norwich, NR15 2NS
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266010418
    Land South of Darlifields, Heywood Road, Tibenham, NR16 1PB
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266005304
    Land East Of Low Road, Tasburgh, Norwich, NR15 2AR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.