Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 May 20233292211

Land at Lawrences Lane, Thatcham, West Berkshire, RG18 3LF

Planning appeal 3292211 at Land at Lawrences Lane, Thatcham, West Berkshire, RG18 3LF (West Berkshire District Council) was dismissed on 5 May 2023 by Inspector Rose D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

Change of use to 7 no. Gypsy/Traveller pitches comprising 7 no. static caravans, 7 no. day rooms, 7 no. touring caravans, and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Rose D
Postcode
RG18 3LF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not it has been shown that any adverse impacts on ecology, biodiversity and the natural environment would be adequately mitigated or compensated
  • would the proposed drainage strategy provide an effective means for the disposal of surface water from the site
  • whether the proposal would facilitate safe and suitable access
  • whether, or to what extent, the development complies with the development plan and national policy set out in Planning policy for traveller sites (PPTS) and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
  • whether there are material considerations, including unmet need for sites, and/or the personal circumstances of intended occupants, which outweigh any conflicts with the development plan and national policy and any other identified harm resulting from the appeal proposal

What decided it

The cumulative substantial harm to landscape character, combined with significant unresolved ecological harm and significant negative weight attached to intentional unauthorised development, outweighed the significant weight given to the personal circumstances of the occupants and their Article 8 rights.

Substantial harm to character and appearance, significant harm to ecology/biodiversity, moderate harm to highway safety, moderate harm from poor site layout, and significant negative weight for intentional unauthorised development were found to outweigh moderate weight for general pitch need, significant weight for personal circumstances/Article 8 rights, and moderate to significant weight for the best interests of the children, with neither a permanent, temporary nor personal-condition permission able to overcome the harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
ADPP1Policy CS7Policy CS13Policy CS14Policy CS16Policy CS17Policy CS18Policy CS19Policy TS3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 174
Judgments
Stevens v SSCLG & Guildford BC [2013] EWHC 792 (Admin); Lisa Smith judgement

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

53 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Berkshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed29 September 20266012621
    Land South of Sandhill, Hampstead Norreys Road, Hermitage, Thatcham, RG18 9XU
  2. Dismissed28 September 20266009359
    76 Mallard Way, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4US
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266009718
    Vyners Estate,, Mill Lane, Tidmarsh, Reading, RG8 8EB
  4. Allowed2 September 20266009448
    Compounds A, A1, And A4, Youngs Industrial Estate, Paices Hill, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PW
  5. Dismissed15 June 20266007181
    Whynot, Eastbury, RG17 7JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.