Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 May 20233294721

Bowline Cottage Rad Lane, Peaslake, GUILDFORD, GU5 9PB

described on the application form as, “To demolish a double garage and replace with a triple garage and store

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
O'Doherty A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of Bowline Cottage and the surrounding area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The combined harms from inappropriate development, loss of openness, and damage to the character and appearance of Bowline Cottage were not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits offered, so very special circumstances did not exist to justify the proposal.

Framework references: 148, 149, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy P2, Policy D1, Policy D15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.