Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed20 October 20223296524

144 Marston Avenue, Dagenham, RM10 7LJ

Planning appeal 3296524 at 144 Marston Avenue, Dagenham, RM10 7LJ (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was allowed on 20 October 2022 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to separation between buildings and how the proposed dwelling would be perceived in the street scene.

Subdivide the plot to create a new self contained two bed house by extending and modifying the existing garage attached to no 144 Marston Avenue. The garage will be extensively remodelled, extended to the rear and a new narrow first floor constructed above part of the garage. A new pitched hipped roof will be constructed above to match the existing roof pitch and design.

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J
Postcode
RM10 7LJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to separation between buildings and how the proposed dwelling would be perceived in the street scene.

What decided it

The proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the area and would accord with the relevant development plan policies requiring protection and enhancement of local character and distinctiveness.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D4Policy D8Policy CP2Policy CM1Policy CP3Policy BP2Policy BP11Policy SP2Policy DMD1Policy DMD4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

352 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  2. Notice upheld17 March 20263332937
    56 Kings Avenue, Romford, RM6 6BB
  3. Notice upheld16 March 20263332931
    532 Becontree Avenue, Dagenham, RM8 3HR
  4. Dismissed12 March 20266001227
    8A Neville Gardens, Dagenham, RM8 3QT
  5. Dismissed27 February 20266001528
    65, Upney Lane, Barking, IG11 9LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.