Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 March 20233297827

Land South of Redenhall Road, Harleston , Norfolk, IP20 9HE

erection of up to 110 dwellings and formation of new vehicular access

Authority
South Norfolk District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Spencer D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • Whether the scheme can be appropriately accessed from Redenhall Road

What decided it

The significant harm to the river valley landscape, the identified town gateway, and conflict with the recently adopted neighbourhood plan and emerging local plan, cumulatively outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing provision under the tilted balance.

The benefits of 110 dwellings including 40% affordable housing and economic benefits were outweighed by the significant harm to the landscape and setting of Harleston, limited harm from uncertain highway details, and significant harm from conflict with the development plan including the recently adopted neighbourhood plan

Framework references: 11, 14, 56, 130, 174

Plan policies cited: Policy 2 of the Joint Core Strategy, Policy DM1.1 of the South Norfolk Local Plan, Policy DM1.3 of the South Norfolk Local Plan, Policy DM3.1 of the South Norfolk Local Plan, Policy DM3.8 of the South Norfolk Local Plan, Policy DM3.11 of the South Norfolk Local Plan, Policy DM3.15 of the South Norfolk Local Plan, Policy DM4.5 of the South Norfolk Local Plan, Policy RWH19 of the Redenhall with Harleston Neighbourhood Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.