Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20223298079

Land Between 124-183, Wild Hill, Teversal, Notts, NG17 3JE, Teversal, NG17 3JE

Planning appeal 3298079 at Land Between 124-183, Wild Hill, Teversal, Notts, NG17 3JE, Teversal, NG17 3JE (Ashfield District Council) was dismissed on 20 December 2022 by Inspector Dean S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be appropriate for its countryside location, its character, appearance or openness.

outline planning application for the erection of up to 9 no. dwellings with associated private access driveways (means of access submitted, all other matters reserved)

Authority
Ashfield District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dean S
Postcode
NG17 3JE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be appropriate for its countryside location, its character, appearance or openness
  • whether or not the site is a sustainable location for the development proposed
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposal on the historic environment

What decided it

The substantial adverse impacts on countryside character, openness, sustainability and highway safety significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery in an area of shortfall.

The benefits of housing delivery in an area of substantial shortfall were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial adverse impacts on countryside character, openness, sustainability and highway safety, such that the proposal did not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ST1Policy ST4Policy EV2Policy HG5Policy NP1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 105

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

25 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 January 20266001120
    Land Between 124 and 142 Church Lane, Selston, Nottinghamshire, NG16 6FD
  2. Allowed3 November 20253366321
    Cedar House, Silverhill Lane, Teversal, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 3JJ
  3. Dismissed27 October 20253364793
    Whitboro Lodge at 261 Wild Hill, Teversal, Nottinghamshire, NG17 3JF
  4. Allowed19 June 20253356635
    Melbourne Farmhouse, 86 Inkerman Road, Selston, Nottinghamshire, NG16 6BN
  5. Dismissed20 January 20253347049
    Land Between 124 and 142, Church Lane, Selston, NG16 6FD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.