Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 November 20223298341

Land at Effingham Lodge Farm, Lower Road, Effingham, Leatherhead, Surrey, KT24 5JR

Planning appeal 3298341 at Land at Effingham Lodge Farm, Lower Road, Effingham, Leatherhead, Surrey, KT24 5JR (Guildford Borough Council) was allowed on 28 November 2022 by Inspector Jones G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect the proposed development would have on the openness of the Green Belt and whether it would conflict with the purposes of including land within the Green Belt by reason of encroachment into the countryside (Appeal A).

hybrid planning application for outline planning permission (only access to be considered) for the erection of 4 self-build dwellings on land at 408-410 Lower Road, Effingham following demolition of all existing buildings; and full planning permission for the erection of 110 dwellings, with access, parking, community assets, landscaping, and associated works on land at Effingham Lodge Farm, Lower Road, Effingham

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Jones G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect the proposed development would have on the openness of the Green Belt and whether it would conflict with the purposes of including land within the Green Belt by reason of encroachment into the countryside (Appeal A)
  • The effect that the proposed development would have on the character and appearance of the area (Appeal A)
  • On the basis that the proposals at Site A would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development (Appeal A)
  • The effect of the proposed development on the setting of the Grade II* listed Church of All Saints and on that of the Little Bookham Conservation Area (Appeal B)

What decided it

For Appeal A, the very special circumstances balance found the benefits of enabling the viable delivery of the replacement school and housing (including affordable housing) clearly outweighed the Green Belt and character harm; for Appeal B, the public benefits were found insufficient to outweigh the less-than-substantial heritage harm to the Grade II* listed church and conservation area.

For Appeal A, the substantial benefits of housing delivery (market and affordable) and the delivery of the much-needed replacement school clearly outweighed the Green Belt, character and appearance harm, establishing very special circumstances; for Appeal B, the same benefits were found insufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II* listed church and conservation area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENP-G1Policy ENP-G5Policy ENP-G2Policy ENP-G3Policy P2Policy D1Policy D3Policy HE4Policy HE10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 95Paragraph 147-150Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

65 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266009962
    Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.