Planning appeal decision
Barn at Green Farm, Ashbocking Green, Ashbocking, Suffolk, IP6 4EQ
Planning appeal 3299544 at Barn at Green Farm, Ashbocking Green, Ashbocking, Suffolk, IP6 4EQ (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 7 August 2023 by Inspector Berry A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing barn, including the significance of the building as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset (NDHA).
the “demolition of all buildings except timber frame barn; conversion, alteration, extensions and change of use to residential of timber frame barn and associated curtilage; erection of cartlodge; installation of package sewage treatment plant; means of access to B1078; and structural landscaping
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Berry A
- Postcode
- IP6 4EQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing barn, including the significance of the building as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset (NDHA)
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers, with particular reference to noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposed development on the operation of the existing farm
- whether the site is in a suitable location for housing development
What decided it
The harm caused to the significance of the Non-Designated Heritage Asset barn through the scale, siting and design of the proposed extensions, combined with the harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area from the proposed access road and the unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers due to proximity to farm operations, were not outweighed by the limited benefits of providing one dwelling and modest economic contribution.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GP1Policy H9Policy H13Policy H17Policy CL11Policy CL12Policy CS1Policy H7Policy CS2Policy CL2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 197Paragraph 12Paragraph 15Paragraph 187Paragraph 6Paragraph 11Paragraph 174Paragraph 105Paragraph 80Paragraph 84Paragraph 152
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Allowed5 August 20266007731Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
- Dismissed16 June 20266006315Orchard House, Cocks Road, Eye, IP23 7NT
- Notice upheld12 March 20263357418Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP
- Allowed22 October 20253369566Fennings Farm, Pixey Green, Stradbroke, Eye Suffolk, IP21 5NH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®