Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 February 20233299660

Land at Top of Sands Loke, Edgefield, Norfolk, NR24 2RQ

Planning appeal 3299660 at Land at Top of Sands Loke, Edgefield, Norfolk, NR24 2RQ (North Norfolk District Council) was dismissed on 16 February 2023 by Inspector Spencer D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed access arrangement on highway safety, with particular reference to the visibility at the junction of Sands Loke with the B1149 Holt Road / Norwich Road.

change of use from agriculture to dog exercise area (sui generis)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Spencer D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed access arrangement on highway safety, with particular reference to the visibility at the junction of Sands Loke with the B1149 Holt Road / Norwich Road
  • the effect of the proposed dog exercise area on the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular reference to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The significantly harmful effect on highway safety arising from inadequate visibility at the Sands Loke junction combined with the notable increase in vehicle movements, which would conflict with Policy CT5 of the North Norfolk Core Strategy and NPPF paragraphs 110 and 111.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CT5 of the North Norfolk Core Strategy 2008Policy EN4 of the North Norfolk Core Strategy 2008Policy EN13 of the North Norfolk Core Strategy 2008
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 56Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

5 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Norfolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed22 September 20266008881
    The Old Post House, Mundesley Road, Trimingham, NR11 8DZ
  2. Dismissed15 September 20266006812
    Green House, Cromer Road, Thorpe Market, NR11 8TH
  3. Dismissed24 August 20266008744
    Land Rear of 1 Nelson Road, North Walsham, NR28 9HL
  4. Split Decision20 March 20266003069
    Ludham Road, Catfield, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR29 5PY
  5. Allowed11 March 20266002109
    8 Langham Road, Blakeney, Norfolk, NR25 7PG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.